https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111548
“The calculated gas selectivities for four hypothetical flue gas or industrially relevant gas mixtures; CH4/N2 (50:50), CO2/CH4 (50:50), CO2/N2 (15:85), and SF6/N2 (10:90), can be seen in Table 2 and Fig. 6a–c. The selectivities are calculated from the data obtained at 293 K (closest to room temperaure) only, as the calculated selectivities are considered to be qualitatively indicative selectivities for real-life applications. The CO2/N2 IAST selectivities at 100 kPa for all samples were found to vary between 25 and 35, where SU-101 showed the highest CO2/N2 selectivity of ∼35, which was comparable to that of UU-200 (∼35), while CAU-17 had the lowest selectivity of ∼25. The CO2/N2 selectivity of UU-200 was also found to be lower than that of porous sorbents such as Mg(H2gal) (377 at 303 K 100 kPa) [64], Fe(Hgal) (612 at 303 K and 100 kPa) [64], zeolite 13X (981 at 298 K and 100 kPa) [65], and ZIF-78 (396 at 298 K and 100 kPa) [66]. But comparable to other MOFs like HKUST-1 (∼30 at 273 K and 100 kPa), HNUST-1 (∼30 at 298 K and 100 kPa), Co-MOF-74 (∼40 at 296 K and 100 kPa), and MIP-202 (∼30 at 298 K and 100 kPa) [55]. Although all samples were found to have Langmuir-shaped CO2 isotherms, indicating an enhanced molecular interaction between the CO2 molecules and the surface of the pores as compared to e.g. CH4 and N2, the comparably high N2 uptakes on CAU-17 and CAU-33 result in an overall lower CO2/N2 selectivity on these samples. The SF6/N2 IAST selectivities showed a similar trend; the highest selectivity was observed on UU-200 (∼45) followed by SU-101 (∼40), and then CAU-17 (∼35). These values were comparable to corresponding literature values for MOFs such as UiO-66 (∼40 at 298 K and 100 kPa) [67] and CAU-17 (∼30 at 293 K and 100 kPa) [29]. The SF6/N2 IAST selectivity was not calculated for CAU-33 due to its SF6-induced flexibility, as the model is typically not applicable for flexible materials [68]. However, modelling of the SF6 isotherm using a number of isotherm models (e.g. modified dual-site Langmuir [69]) is possible for other purposes. It has also been documented in recent literature that the IAST model has a number of shortcomings; IAST assumes an ideal gas mixture and is particularly problematic for gases with low interaction with the sorbent (as integration over a large pressure range is needed if the selectivity of the sorbent is high). As highlighted by Cheung et al. [70] and Björnerbäck et al. [71], in order to utilize the IAST model, binary or multi-component gas adsorption isotherms are needed. We therefore also calculate the CO2 and SF6 selectivity using the Henry’s law model and the numbers are listed in Table 2 for comparison.”
“Fig. 6. IAST selectivities for hypothetical gas mixtures composed of (a) CO2/CH4 (50:50), (b) CO2/N2 (15:85), (c) SF6/N2 (10:90) and (d) pressure-swing CO2 adsorption cycling on UU-200, CAU-17, CAU-33, and SU-101.”