https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013160 “Table 2 lists the solvent regeneration energies reported in the literature. The regeneration energies refer to the heat requirement for regeneration of solvents (reboiler
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118959 ” As mentioned above, the main contribution to the overall energy consumption of solvent-based CO2 capture processes is the thermal energy required in the CO2 desorber,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118959 ” Table 8 shows the operating conditions that minimize the specific equivalent work of the overall capture process, ω, for the most representative advanced configurations aiming at
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118959 2.3.1. Technical Indicators Integrating the CO2 capture process by chemical absorption in a steam power plant has a significant impact on its overall performance, decreasing
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118959 ” The NH3 capture process was analyzed for different mass concentrations of 2, 5, 7, and 15% respectively, comparing the results with the CO2 capture reference
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118959 ” The values of the impact indicators quantify the emissions from the two stages of the fuel life cycle, namely extraction, processing, transport (stage
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118959 ” The performance assessment of the advanced configurations and the comparison among different PFD’s have been carried out with reference to the following process
A free platform to share knowledge of science and engineering. Extensive analysis of literature and summarized review in carbon capture science and technology.
© 2022 Science-Share.com.All Rights Reserved.