https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01352C
“Naami, et al.59 have studied experimentally KGCO2aV for CO2 absorption using a DEAB solution. They also investigated absorption using MEA, MDEA, DEAB, and blended solutions included MDEA–MEA and DEAB–MEA. The authors performed their experiments on an absorber column packed with DX-type structured packing (height 2.15 m; diameter 0.0275 m). It was concluded that the presence of MEA in the DEAB solution increased the KGCO2aV values. The authors also investigated the effect of the liquid flow rate on the KGCO2aV values, and found that by increasing it in a narrow range, KGCO2aV values increased rapidly. Nevertheless, the KGCO2aV values were unaffected by the gas flow rate for the above-mentioned amines. The absorption capacity and cyclic capacity between DEAB and MDEA were also compared in the study, and it was found that the new amine, DEAB, has a higher CO2 absorption and cyclic capacity than MDEA, which causes a reduction in the amine circulation rate and energy consumption for amine regeneration. Fu, et al.61 have determined experimentally KGCO2aV for CO2 absorption into a DETA solution. They performed the experiment on a random absorber column (packing height 1.14 m; column diameter 0.024 m) packed with Dixon rings which have a specific surface area of around 2400 m2 m−3. Their results showed that the KGCO2aV values for DETA were higher compared with MEA, and the KGCO2aV values increased as the DETA flow rate, DETA concentration, and inlet temperature increased. However, the KGCO2aV values decreased when the CO2 loading of DETA increased. Fu, et al.76 have investigated the KGCO2aV parameter using a DETA solution. They performed the experiment on a structured absorber column (packing height 1.7 m; column diameter 0.028 m) packed with a DX packing which has a specific surface area of around 900 m2 m−3. They compared the KGCO2aV values between DETA–CO2 and MEA–CO2 systems, and found that the KGCO2aV values of DETA were higher compared with MEA. In addition, they showed that by increasing the DETA flow rate, concentration, and inlet temperature, the KGCO2aV values increased. Nevertheless, the KGCO2aV values decreased as the CO2 loading of DETA increased. Liang, et al.44 have investigated the mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption by a 1DMA2P solution. They obtained KGCO2aV for a structured absorber column (packing height 1.4 m; column diameter 0.028 m) packed with DX packing. The authors compared the KGCO2aV values for 1DMA2P–CO2 with those for MEA–CO2 and MDEA–CO2 systems, and found that the KGCO2aV values of the MEA solution were higher compared with 1DMA2P and MDEA solutions. They ranked them as MEA > 1DMA2P > MDEA. In addition, they showed that by increasing the CO2 loading for the three mentioned systems, the KGCO2aV values decreased. Following the study of Liang, et al.,44 Wen, et al.77 obtained the KGCO2aV values in an absorber column packed with Dixon rings for 1DMA2P–CO2 system. They compared the KGCO2aV values for 1DMA2P–CO2 with those for the MDEA–CO2 system, and found that the KGCO2aV values of the new amine solution were higher compared with the MDEA solution. In addition, the effects of the gas flow rate, amine concentration, amine flow rate, CO2 loading, and amine temperature on the KGCO2aV values were investigated and the results indicated that the KGCO2aV values increased with increasing amine concentrations and amine flow rates, but decreased with increasing CO2 loading. The inert gas flow rate had little effect on the KGCO2aV values. For the amine temperature, the KGCO2aV values increased up to 323 K in temperature range of 303–333 K, and decreased as amine temperature went above 323 K. Xu, et al.33 have conducted experiments for CO2 absorption in a DEEA solution. The experiments were carried out for both random and structured packing columns, namely DX and Dixon rings. The authors obtained the KGCO2aV values in an absorber column with a 1.7 m packing height and a 0.028 m diameter. The effects of important process parameters on the KGCO2aV values were investigated. The results showed that the DEEA concentration, CO2 loading, and liquid flow rate had the most pronounced effect on KGCO2aV, whilst the gas flow rate had a negligible effect. The authors compared the KGCO2aV values between MDEA–CO2 and DEEA–CO2 systems, and showed that the KGCO2aV values for DEEA were higher compared with the MDEA solution. They also showed that the DX-type structured packing enhanced the KGCO2aV values and cyclic capacity compared with the Dixon rings packing. Chen, et al.78 have used the experimental design method including the Taguchi method to select blended amines (MEA–DEAE, MEA–MDEA, MEA–DIPA, and MEA + AMP) as promising solvents for CO2 capture in a packed column (packing height 1.2 m; column diameter 0.05 m). The optimum points and effects of three key process parameters including the liquid flow rate, gas flow rate and amine concentration on the absorption rate and KGCO2aV were studied. Sixteen runs were carried out by the Taguchi method at four levels for four factors to obtain the response values (absorption efficiency, absorption rate, scrubbing factor, and KGCO2aV). In case of KGCO2aV, the values were obtained using a two-film model. The results of the study indicated that the gas flow rate and amine flow rate are significant parameters, while the type of amine and amine concentration showed little effect on the KGCO2aV values.”