3.2. Eluent Optimization
The optimization of the tartaric acid concentration in the eluent with 2 mM 18-crown-6 was conducted to achieve a good separation of analyte ions using the IEC/CEC system. As shown in
Supplementary Figure S3A, the retention times of the anions were slightly increased by enhancing the penetration effects, a side effect of the IEC, into the cation-exchange phase [
19,
20]. In contrast, the retention times of the cations dramatically decreased by increasing the tartaric acid concentration, which, in turn, reduced the cation-exchange effect. Hence, a higher concentration of tartaric acid in the eluent should be used to reduce the analytical time as much as possible. However, when the tartaric acid concentration was increased from 2 to 8 mM, the peak resolution (
Rs) between the Na
+–NH
4+ (1.16–0.67) and the NH
4+–K
+ (1.82–0.97) was inadequate, as shown in
Supplementary Figure S4A. Hence, 5 mM of tartaric acid was used as the optimal concentration because it afforded the best resolution of the analyte ions under the maximum possible reduced analytical time.
Next, varying concentrations of 18-crown-6 were added to 5 mM of the tartaric acid eluent to improve the resolution between NH
4+ and K
+ [
21]. The separation is based on the stability constant of the complexation of alkali metal ions with 18-crown-6 (log
KNa+ = 0.80, log
KNH4+ = 1.23, and log
KK+ = 2.03) [
22]. When included in the eluent, 18-crown-6 absorbs onto the cation-exchange resin in the column and increases the retention time of the associated monovalent cations [
23]. The retention time of K
+ increased depending on the 18-crown-6 concentration, as shown in
Supplementary Figure S3B. The peak resolution (
Rs) between NH
4+ and K
+ also improved when the concentration of 18-crown-6 increased in the following order: 1 mM (
Rs = 0.60) < 2 mM (
Rs = 1.34) < 3 mM (
Rs = 2.02) < 4 mM (
Rs = 2.33) < 5 mM (
Rs = 2.65) < 6 mM (
Rs = 3.10), as shown in
Supplementary Figure S4B. The 3 mM concentration of 18-crown-6 was selected as the optimal concentration because the obtained
Rs value was higher than the 1.5 required to ensure total separation.
Consequently, the IEC/CEC using 5 mM tartaric acid and 3 mM 18-crown-6 as the eluent (pH 2.98) successfully achieved simultaneous separation of the analyte ions with phosphate ion, as shown in A. In addition, the optimized system could separate the inorganic ionic components in 5-fold diluted fertilizer solution collected on day 9 of the hydroponic cultivation, as shown in B.
Figure 2. Optimal chromatograms for the separation of (A) standard sample, and (B) 5-fold diluted fertilizer solution sample collected on day 9. Peaks: (1) SO42−, (2) Cl−, (3) NO3−, (4) H2PO4−, (5) Na+, (6) K+, (7) NH4+, (8) Mg2+, and (9) Ca2+. Conditions: Column: Two Tosoh TSKgel Super-IC-A/C (6.00 mm I.D. × 150 mm) and a Shodex SH-1011 (8.00 mm I.D. × 300 mm) connected in tandem; column temperature: 55 °C; injection volume: 20 µL; eluent concentration: 5 mM tartaric acid and 3 mM 18-crown-6; eluent flow rate: 1.0 mL/min. Injected samples: (A) mixture of 1.0 mM MgSO4, NaCl, NH4NO3, KH2PO4, and CaCl2, and (B) 5-fold diluted fertilizer solution sample collected on day 9.