https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247520
“CO2 adsorption isotherms obtained at 273 K and 298 K are presented in Figure 7A,B, respectively. The data values of CO2 adsorption capacity are shown in Table 5. The CO2 uptake increased in the order of Mg2+ < Ca2+ < K+ < Na+ < Li+. One should notice that the obtained results are positively correlated with the increased micro- and submicropore volume of these samples.”
“Figure 8 presents the correlations of CO2 uptake vs. micropore or submicropore volumes at 273 K and 298 K. As the CO2 uptake is negligible for non-porous materials, the linear equation has only one parameter, i.e., slope. In all cases, the R2 parameter is above 0.9, which may indicate a high impact of the pore volume on the CO2 uptake. One should notice that in case of submicropores, the slope has a higher value compared to impact. This indicates that submicropores are crucial for CO2 sorption, which is supported by other studies [30,31,32].”
“The Li0.61Na0.39X form of zeolite indicated the CO2 adsorption capacity of 5.94 mmol/g and 5.71 mmol/g at 273 K and 298 K, respectively. The other forms of ion-exchanged samples showed a decrease of CO2 uptake compared with the sodium form. It is worth to notice that Li0.61Na0.39X and NaX samples indicated the rapid increase of CO2 adsorption at a low equilibrium pressure. The same effect was observed for the potassium-exchanged form. Nevertheless, in case of the K0.76Na0.24X sample, this tendency declines at a higher pressure range. This is related to a reduction of the micropores fraction.