Follow:

Ion exchanged X zeolite for CO2 capture at 273 and 298 K

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247520

“CO2 adsorption isotherms obtained at 273 K and 298 K are presented in Figure 7A,B, respectively. The data values of CO2 adsorption capacity are shown in Table 5. The CO2 uptake increased in the order of Mg2+ < Ca2+ < K+ < Na+ < Li+. One should notice that the obtained results are positively correlated with the increased micro- and submicropore volume of these samples.”

 

7mGVXSh48800teapWeChat-Image_20221015154647

Figure 8 presents the correlations of CO2 uptake vs. micropore or submicropore volumes at 273 K and 298 K. As the CO2 uptake is negligible for non-porous materials, the linear equation has only one parameter, i.e., slope. In all cases, the R2 parameter is above 0.9, which may indicate a high impact of the pore volume on the CO2 uptake. One should notice that in case of submicropores, the slope has a higher value compared to impact. This indicates that submicropores are crucial for CO2 sorption, which is supported by other studies [30,31,32].”

“The Li0.61Na0.39X form of zeolite indicated the CO2 adsorption capacity of 5.94 mmol/g and 5.71 mmol/g at 273 K and 298 K, respectively. The other forms of ion-exchanged samples showed a decrease of CO2 uptake compared with the sodium form. It is worth to notice that Li0.61Na0.39X and NaX samples indicated the rapid increase of CO2 adsorption at a low equilibrium pressure. The same effect was observed for the potassium-exchanged form. Nevertheless, in case of the K0.76Na0.24X sample, this tendency declines at a higher pressure range. This is related to a reduction of the micropores fraction.

Moreover, sorbent materials might be characterized in terms of normalized CO2 uptake, which in our case was obtained by dividing the CO2 uptake at 273 K by SBET. The following values were obtained: 9.52 × 10−3 mmol/m2 for Li0.61Na0.39X, 9.75 × 10−3 mmol/m2 for NaX, 9.15 × 10−3 mmol/m2 for K0.76Na0.24X, 9.33 × 10−3 mmol/m2 for Mg0.32Na0.36X and 8.33 × 10−3 mmol/m2 for Ca0.45Na0.10X. These values might provide useful information, mostly about the influence of the surface chemistry or some additional interactions. As can be seen, sample NaX has the highest normalized adsorption capacity, and for sample Li0.61Na0.39X, this value is slightly lower. Interestingly, it might be concluded that the higher the amount of sodium in the zeolite is, the higher the normalized adsorption capacity is.”

Leave a Comment