Follow:

Influence of AMP (2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol) concentration

https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127095

“The chemical concentration is one of the most concerning parameters that may possibly affect the removal performance. To observe the influence of the chemical concentration on the process performance, different blends of PZ + AMP were prepared by maintaining the PZ concentration at 7 wt.% and added to 3, 13, 23, and 33 wt.% concentrations of AMP. Hence, the chemical concentration was tested in the range from 10 to 40 wt.%. The gas and liquid phases were constantly supplied to the column at flow rates of 26.52 kmol/m2∙h and 4.33 m3/m2∙h, respectively. The variations in the chemical concentration and Lamine/GCO2 ratio that were analysed in the current experimental work are shown in Table 5. It can be seen that the Lamine/GCO2 ratio increased as the amine concentration increased.”

Table 5. Variations in the chemical concentration and Lamine/GCO2 ratio.
Chemical Concentration (wt.%) CO2 Flow Rate
(GCO2) (kmol/m2 h)
Total Liquid Flow Rate (kmol/m2∙h) Amine Flow Rate (Lamine) (kmol/m2 h) Lamine/GCO2(kmol/kmol)
10 10.61 15.84 5.33 0.50
20 10.61 15.84 10.44 0.98
30 10.61 15.84 15.37 1.45
40 10.61 15.84 20.26 1.91

Figure 9 shows that an increase in the chemical concentration from 10 to 40 wt.% can lead to respective increments in the CO2 removal performance from 33% to 100% at the exit of the column. By observing the trendline for the blended solution containing 40 wt.% PZ + AMP, a significant increase was observed at the column height from 0 to 1.02 m, followed by a steady increase beyond the 1.02 m section to achieve 100% removal. A high absorption percentage was observed at the bottom section of the column (0 to 0.68 m), in which approximately 56% of the CO2 molecules in the gas stream were absorbed by the absorbent. The remaining 18% of CO2 in the gas phase travelled upwards in the column, where the CO2–amine reaction began to decrease due to the decreased CO2 concentration in the gas phase. Hence, within the middle section of the column (0.68 to 1.36 m), this system was able to remove 37% more CO2 from the gas stream. This system achieved 100% CO2 removal at the column height of 1.70 m. Hence, it was concluded that the blended solution containing 40 wt.% PZ + AMP (Lamine/GCO2 ratio = 1.91) demonstrated excellent CO2 removal within 83% of the column height.”

9

At the bottom section (0 to 0.68 m) of the column, the blended solution containing 30 wt.% PZ + AMP was able to remove 15% of the CO2 followed by 24% of the CO2 in the middle section of the column (0.68 to 1.36 m). The highest removal performance occurred within the top section (1.36 to 2.04 m), where 51% of the CO2 was removed from the gas phase. Hence, the total CO2 removal performance by the blended solution containing 30 wt.% PZ + AMP was 90%. However, this condition was insufficient for meeting sale gas specifications due to the remaining 10% of CO2 in the treated gas.
On the other hand, based on the trendline for the blended solutions containing 10 wt.% and 20 wt.% PZ + AMP, CO2 absorption was enhanced at the top section of the column, as observed within the 1.36 and 2.04 m marks. Approximately 26% and 49% of the CO2 was removed within this section by the 10 wt.% and 20 wt.% blended solutions, respectively. However, no significant changes were observed in terms of CO2 removal at the column height from 0 to 1.36 m. In this section, less than 8% of the CO2 was removed from the system due to insufficient chemicals being present to react with the CO2 in the gas phase. As mentioned in the previous subsections, this behaviour might be due to the saturation in the CO2 loading capacity of the absorbent. Thus, a reduction in CO2-amine reactions can be observed in this section compared to in the top section. This observation shows that an Lamine/GCO2 ratio of less than 1.0 was insufficient for the CO2 removal process.
As illustrated in Figure 10, the CO2 absorption performance was greatly enhanced at higher chemical concentrations. The CO2 removal efficiency substantially increased from 33% to 100%, while the KGav¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ value was dramatically enhanced from 0.024 to 0.276 kmol/m3∙h∙kPa when the chemical concentration was in the range from 10 to 40 wt.%. The Lamine/GCO2 ratio was also increased from 0.50 to 1.91, leading to improvements of up to 11.5 times for the mass transfer performance. These experimental results were expected due to the increased availability of free active amine molecules at higher chemical concentrations, which helped to accelerate the reaction between the amine and CO2 molecules [23]. Hence, a higher Lamine/GCO2 ratio resulted in a higher CO2 removal efficiency and mass transfer performance. Based on the mass transfer, these increments were due to the increased enhancement factor, E, in the chemical reaction, which would consequently reduce the liquid film’s resistance at higher amine concentrations [7]. Since liquid films mainly control the CO2 absorption process, a liquid film with low resistance can be attributed to a better mass transfer performance [23].

10

“Apart from the higher process performance at a higher amine concentration, the increase in viscosity as the amine concentration increases needs to be considered, as it could possibly hinder CO2 diffusion across the gas to liquid film [64]. It could also reduce mass transfer performance due to the reduced effective area of the absorbent on the packing surface. Furthermore, the high amine concentration could also contribute to processing equipment corrosion. Therefore, an optimal chemical concentration is vital for the potential absorbent to be applied as an industrial absorbent.”

Leave a Comment