https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA48052F
“The zeolite chabazite (CHA – shown in Fig. 1) is one of the most studied zeolites with narrow pore windows. It has a highly accessible porous framework of the 8-ring class with exchangeable cation sites. It exists naturally but can also be synthesized.41 As the cations can very easily be exchanged, many forms of zeolite chabazite exist. Barrer and associates studied the sorption properties of natural chabazite in detail.8,10–12,17,41 Zeolite chabazite can occlude and separate molecules by their size. This property first shown by Barrer and Ibbiston.17 Zeolite chabazite occluded small straight chain hydrocarbons but branched hydrocarbons were completely excluded. This separation ability was due to the narrow pore windows of chabazite (0.38 × 0.38 nm).42,43 More of zeolite chabazite’s ability to separate different gas molecules was demonstrated further by Janák et al.44 and many of the work from Webley’s group.27,45,46 Webley and associates observed that CO2 adsorbed significantly more on all their zeolite chabazite samples when compared with N2 and CH4.27 Zeolite chabazite in its K+ form (K-CHA) had enhanced ability to separate CO2 from N2 and CH4. The CO2 uptake of K-CHA, Na-CHA and K-CHA at 113 kPa (273 K) was around 5 times higher than the N2 uptake (Fig. 2). Furthermore, at low pressures (1.0 kPa), this ratio (CO2 adsorbed: N2 adsorbed, per cavity) reached over 300 : 1 for K-CHA. They attributed this finding to the fact that CO2 molecules could penetrate into the windows at low pressures, but the larger N2 was essentially blocked by the big K+ cation.”
“In terms of the capacity to adsorb CO2, previous literature shows that zeolites chabazite generally has a high capacity. Inui et al.47 showed that under pressure swing adsorption (PSA) conditions, zeolite chabazite had high uptake of CO2 (∼3.5 mmol g−1) and low irreversible uptake at high pressures (up to 1.1 MPa). Watson et al.48 demonstrated that the uptake of CO2 of a natural version of zeolite chabazite could reach over 5 mmol g−1 at a high pressure (3 MPa, 305 K). Na-CHA and Li-CHA both showed high uptake of CO2.45 The equilibrium uptake of CO2 at 120 kPa (273 K) was ∼4.4 mmol g−1 and 4.5 mmol g−1 for Na-CHA and Li-CHA, respectively. K-CHA, Mg-CHA and Ca-CHA showed CO2 uptake of ∼4.0 mmol g−1 under the same conditions.45 Ba-CHA showed a slightly lower uptake of CO2 (∼3.5 mmol g−1) under those conditions. The uptake of CO2 at low and close to zero loading was higher on Ba-CHA than on Li-CHA. The high uptake at low pressures may be related to the strong cation-quadrupole interaction for Ba2+ cation and CO2. This trend illustrates that the cation charge density, the electrical field gradients of the material and the interaction with the quadrupole moment of CO2 all are important. The original study (Zhang et al.45) gave detailed analysis into these observations. Zhang et al.45 also examined the CO2 isotherms of different ion exchanged chabazite materials in detail. They considered the dependence of the enthalpy of CO2 sorption on the cation. For Li-CHA and Na-CHA, the enthalpy of CO2 sorption increased with increased loading. Their findings agreed with the suggested explanations for the uptake dependencies on the cations, at different pressures. For Ba-CHA, Mg-CHA and K-CHA, the enthalpy of CO2 sorption dropped at high loading. This was rationalized and related to a decrease of the cation-quadrupole interaction, and that the sorbate–sorbate interaction in these materials was not dominant. In the case of Ca-CHA, the enthalpy of CO2 sorption stayed fairly constant with an increased loading, indicative of a balanced contribution from sorbate–sorbate interaction and cation-quadrupole interaction. These findings were corroborated by the high uptake of CO2 observed on Ba-CHA at very low pressures of CO2.”