Technical performance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.024 “As mentioned earlier, Enaasen et al. [41] and Pinto et al. [42] did not specify the heat loss along the column. Although the experiments were carried out in

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.024 “In order to check the performance of the pilots, Fig. 7 shows the experimental specific reboiler duty in all the campaigns as a function of rich

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.024 ” Firstly, the standard ENRTL-RK ASPEN PLUS model available in ASPEN PLUS v8.6 was used to simulate the data from Tobiesen et al. [15]. The

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 “A lot of literature may not be available on an extensive trade-off analysis between energy cost and capital cost at different ΔTmin in a post-combustion CO2 capture

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 ” The minimum temperature approach of the lean/rich heat exchanger of a solvent-based CO2 absorption and desorption process determines how much heat can be recovered

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 ” The results obtained in the base case process simulations of this work are compared with those found in the literature in Table 5 and Table 6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100249 “Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 present the cost estimations, performed using APEA, for the studied cases with MEA and a-MDEA, respectively. This analysis shows that by introducing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100249 “Table 6 summarizes the simulation results for the MEA cases, and Table 7 summarizes those for the a-MDEA cases. From left to right in the tables, the