Economic performance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100041 “The TEA of CO2 capturing technology is important for the feasibility of the setup of the facility. A few researchers (Singh, Croiset et al. 2003, Schach, Schneider et al. 2010, Husebye, Brunsvold et al. 2012, Roussanaly, Brunsvold et al. 2013, Ali, Agbonghae et al. 2016, Li, Leigh et al. 2016, Hu, Xu et al. 2017, Rolfe, Huang et al.

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 ” Figure 22. Sensitivity analysis of TPC on the energy and heat exchanger costs trade–off analyses at different ΔTmin for different heat exchanger types in a standard

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 ” Figure 21. Sensitivity analysis of TPC on the energy and heat exchanger costs trade–off analyses at different ΔTmin for different heat exchanger types in a standard

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 ” Figure 20. Sensitivity analysis of steam cost on the energy and heat exchanger costs trade–off analyses at different ΔTmin for different heat exchanger types in a

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 “Figure 19. Sensitivity analysis of steam cost on the energy and heat exchanger costs trade–off analyses at different ΔTmin for different heat exchanger types in a standard

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 “The available waste or excess heat at the Norcem AS cement plant in Brevik can cover for the production of steam for 50% CO2 capture.

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 ” In this section, the CO2 avoided cost at different ΔTmin of the lean/rich heat exchanger using the PHE and FTS-STHX are compared with that of the

https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020425 ” The previous section only considered economic viability without taking into account climate change implications. The actual CO2 emission reductions are not considered in CO2 capture