Vortex spray scrubber

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.053 The above reference reported the experimental and numerical studies of a spray column based CO2 absorption using MEA. Two spray methods including dual-nozzle opposed

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper reports the influence of column height on CO2 removal efficiency using 40% MEA solvent. The results were shown in Figure 11

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper provides results and discussion about the influence of MEA concentration and liquid flow rate on CO2 removal efficiency using the spray

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper reports the results and discussion about the influence of MEA concentrations on mass transfer coefficient at liquid flow rate of 7.6 × 10−4 m3/min

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper provides details of experimental set up of MEA-based CO2 capture using the spray column reactor. The methodologies include the overall experimental

A summary of a few MEA-based CO2 capture using spray column was reported in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012. “Spray absorption of CO2 into monoethanolamine: Mass transfer coefficients, dropsize,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.032 ““

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.032 ““