https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.005 ” 4.5.1. Justification for case study For comparison between the conventional absorber using packed column and the intensified absorber using RPB, detailed study of some
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.009 ” The flow rate of steam to the reboiler is increased rapidly to 200% at t = 0 and remains at this value for 41 min, while all
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.009 ” Although similar to the previous scenario, a significant difference is that flue gas is continuously fed to the absorber column during reboiler steam
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.009 ” Before the capture plant decoupling scenario is initiated, the plant is operating at steady state baseload. The flow rates of steam and gas
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.009 ” Due to the nature of the shutdown sequence, which involves a continued circulation of solvent at 30% of baseload in order to lower
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.009 ” The shutdown sequence is initiated at t = 0 min as shown in Fig. 6a. Steam flow rate is ramped down to zero over 10 min at a rate
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.009 ” To effectively understand the impact of dynamic scenarios on solvent CO2 loading at the absorber inlet and outlet, time-shifting is utilised in order to
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1289 “The final absorber configurations evaluated for the case study conditions outlined in Section 4.3 are summarized in Table 3 (90% CO2 capture) and Table
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1289 “The first step in evaluating the hybrid intercooling design was to perform a detailed analysis of the performance compared to the recycle design for
A free platform to share knowledge of science and engineering. Extensive analysis of literature and summarized review in carbon capture science and technology.
© 2022 Science-Share.com.All Rights Reserved.