https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.053 The above reference reported the experimental and numerical studies of a spray column based CO2 absorption using MEA. Two spray methods including dual-nozzle opposed
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper reports the influence of column height on CO2 removal efficiency using 40% MEA solvent. The results were shown in Figure 11
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper provides results and discussion about the influence of MEA concentration and liquid flow rate on CO2 removal efficiency using the spray
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper reports the results and discussion about the influence of MEA concentrations on mass transfer coefficient at liquid flow rate of 7.6 × 10−4 m3/min
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 The above paper provides details of experimental set up of MEA-based CO2 capture using the spray column reactor. The methodologies include the overall experimental
A summary of a few MEA-based CO2 capture using spray column was reported in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012. “Spray absorption of CO2 into monoethanolamine: Mass transfer coefficients, dropsize,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.032 ““
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.032 ““
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.005 ” 4.5.1. Justification for case study For comparison between the conventional absorber using packed column and the intensified absorber using RPB, detailed study of some
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.005 ” 4.4.1. Justification for case study Temperature bulge in conventional absorber was reported by Freguia and Rochelle (2003), Kvamsdal and Rochelle (2008), Kvamsdal et al. (2009). It limits
A free platform to share knowledge of science and engineering. Extensive analysis of literature and summarized review in carbon capture science and technology.
© 2022 Science-Share.com.All Rights Reserved.