Follow:

CaO-based dual functional materials for ICCU-DRM

Integrated CO2 capture and utilisation for syngas production using methane as the reducing agent are very promising for solving two greenhouse gases (methane and CO2). Using methane to reduce CO2 also has better economic feasibility than using H2. Early work was reported about ICCU-DRM (dry reforming of methane) using Ni/MgO-Al2O3 DFM, prepared by coprecipitation (https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03063). During the ICCU experiments, 20% CO2 in N2 was used as the CO2 source, and 2.4% CH4 in N2 was used as the reducing agent. The DFM is a mixture of calcined limestone and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 catalyst. Very supervising results are reported with almost 100% conversion of CO2 and methane (as shown in the below figure).

Picture1G20eNRI

This needs to be further tested as the decomposition of CaCO3 could not be avoided at 720 °C. Thus a significant amount of CO2 is expected in ICCU. However, this is not researched in detail about the mechanism behind the excellent ICCU performance. It is noted that a paper published in Science Advance (DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav5077) demonstrated that CO2 utilisation efficiency was about 65% and the conversion of methane was about 86%, when Ni/CaO DFMs were used. The key difference between these two papers is the involvement of MgO and Al2O3. This Science Advance paper also indicated that the presence of Ni was essential for ICCU, and using CH4 as a reducing agent could significantly enhance the kinetics of CaCO3 decomposition (as indicated below).

DFMs containing Ni, CeO2 nanoparticles, ZrO2 and CaCO3 were reported for ICCU-DRM. ZrO2 played a key role in stabilising both CaO and particles, maintaining the performance of CO2 capture and utilisation. The presence of CeO2 prohibited the formation of coke and also enhanced the activation of CO2 and CH4. However, only over 40% conversion of CH4 and CO2 was reported. Experimental conditions for this work are below:

“The performance of the bifunctional materials for cyclic CO2 capture and conversion was compared by performing 25 cycles of CaLDRM process at 720 °C and 1 bar. Each cycle comprises 2 min CO2 capture step (i.e. CaO carbonation) in 5 vol% CO2/Ar (30 N mL min−1) followed by 2 min DRM step (accompanied by CaO regeneration) in 8 vol% CH4/Ar (30 N mL min−1). ”

Leave a Comment